Eswatini vs Norway: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Eswatini
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 169.37 t against 150 t in Eswatini, a difference of 19.37 t.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 70th and Norway ranks 68th of 108 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.12 t | 1,500 t | 1,481 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 77.62 t | 460.86 t | 383.24 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Eswatini or Norway?
- Norway, at 169.37 t against 150 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Eswatini and Norway?
- 19.37 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Eswatini and Norway rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Eswatini ranks 70th and Norway ranks 68th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf