Ireland vs Senegal: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Ireland
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 408 t against 337.55 t in Ireland, a difference of 70.45 t.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.2 times Ireland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Ireland ranks 61st and Senegal ranks 58th of 108 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.19 t | 788.24 t | 783.05 t | Senegal |
| 2010s | 8.46 t | 13 t | 4.54 t | Senegal |
| 2020s | 179.18 t | 289.88 t | 110.7 t | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Ireland or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 408 t against 337.55 t in Ireland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Ireland and Senegal?
- 70.45 t, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Senegal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Senegal rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Ireland ranks 61st and Senegal ranks 58th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf