Italy vs Kenya: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Italy
9,325 t
in 2024
Kenya
8,970 t
in 2024
Italy rank
28th
Kenya rank
29th
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Italy
- Kenya
How they compare
Italy currently reports 9,325 t against 8,970 t in Kenya, a difference of 355 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 29th of 108 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,809 t | 225.91 t | 2,584 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 5,447 t | 244.31 t | 5,203 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 7,033 t | 3,976 t | 3,057 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Italy or Kenya?
- Italy, at 9,325 t against 8,970 t in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Italy and Kenya?
- 355 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kenya?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Kenya rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Italy ranks 28th and Kenya ranks 29th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf