Italy vs Romania: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Italy
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 11,322 t against 9,325 t in Italy, a difference of 1,997 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 28th and Romania ranks 25th of 108 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,551 t | 552.6 t | 1,998 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 5,198 t | 1,273 t | 3,925 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 7,749 t | 6,560 t | 1,189 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Italy or Romania?
- Romania, at 11,322 t against 9,325 t in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Italy and Romania?
- 1,997 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Romania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Romania rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Italy ranks 28th and Romania ranks 25th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf