Qatar vs Sweden: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Qatar
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 629.3 t against 500 t in Qatar, a difference of 129.3 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 108 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 595.66 t | 61.4 t | 534.26 t | Qatar |
| 2010s | 1,333 t | 471.26 t | 862.14 t | Qatar |
| 2020s | 448.24 t | 505.96 t | 57.72 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Qatar or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 629.3 t against 500 t in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Qatar and Sweden?
- 129.3 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Sweden?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Qatar and Sweden rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Qatar ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 52nd of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf