Romania vs Slovenia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Romania
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 11,441 t against 11,322 t in Romania, a difference of 119 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Slovenia ahead.
Romania ranks 25th and Slovenia ranks 24th of 108 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 552.6 t | 81.47 t | 471.14 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 1,273 t | 234.81 t | 1,038 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 6,560 t | 2,866 t | 3,694 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Romania or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 11,441 t against 11,322 t in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Romania and Slovenia?
- 119 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Slovenia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Romania and Slovenia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Romania ranks 25th and Slovenia ranks 24th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf