Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity
Sri Lanka
1.55 t
in 2021
Uruguay
1.48 t
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
96th
Uruguay rank
97th
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1.55 t against 1.48 t in Uruguay, a difference of 0.07 t.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 96th and Uruguay ranks 97th of 108 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.51 t | 517 t | 514.49 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 1.1 t | 1,206 t | 1,204 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 1.55 t against 1.48 t in Uruguay as of 2021.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0.07 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2016.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export quantity?
- Sri Lanka ranks 96th and Uruguay ranks 97th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf