Congo vs Morocco: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export value over time
- Congo
- Morocco
How they compare
Congo currently reports 35.37 1000 USD against 26.8 1000 USD in Morocco, a difference of 8.57 1000 USD.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Morocco's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 82nd and Morocco ranks 84th of 115 countries.
Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.11 1000 USD | 2,378 1000 USD | 2,297 1000 USD | Morocco |
| 2020s | 48.97 1000 USD | 9,096 1000 USD | 9,047 1000 USD | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export value, Congo or Morocco?
- Congo, at 35.37 1000 USD against 26.8 1000 USD in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export value between Congo and Morocco?
- 8.57 1000 USD, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Morocco?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Morocco rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export value?
- Congo ranks 82nd and Morocco ranks 84th of 115 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf