Estonia vs Paraguay: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export value over time
- Estonia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.17 1000 USD against 0 1000 USD in Paraguay, a difference of 0.17 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Paraguay ahead.
Estonia ranks 105th and Paraguay ranks 107th of 108 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,538 1000 USD | 37.91 1000 USD | 1,500 1000 USD | Estonia |
| 2020s | 8,141 1000 USD | 97.72 1000 USD | 8,044 1000 USD | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export value, Estonia or Paraguay?
- Estonia, at 0.17 1000 USD against 0 1000 USD in Paraguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export value between Estonia and Paraguay?
- 0.17 1000 USD, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Paraguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Paraguay rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — export value?
- Estonia ranks 105th and Paraguay ranks 107th of 108 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf