Armenia vs Niger: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Armenia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 408.45 t against 283.47 t in Armenia, a difference of 124.98 t.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.4 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Niger ahead.
Armenia ranks 119th and Niger ranks 116th of 178 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.65 t | 46.83 t | 38.18 t | Niger |
| 2010s | 533.85 t | 1,125 t | 591.49 t | Niger |
| 2020s | 192.11 t | 1,223 t | 1,031 t | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Armenia or Niger?
- Niger, at 408.45 t against 283.47 t in Armenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Armenia and Niger?
- 124.98 t, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Niger?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Niger rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Armenia ranks 119th and Niger ranks 116th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf