Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Republic of Korea: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
735,774 t
in 2024
Republic of Korea
769,665 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) rank
10th
Republic of Korea rank
9th

Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade)
  • Republic of Korea
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M200220132024

How they compare

Republic of Korea currently reports 769,665 t against 735,774 t in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 33,891 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ahead.

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 10th and Republic of Korea ranks 9th of 178 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) Republic of Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 541,905 t 568,674 t 26,770 t Republic of Korea
2010s 550,963 t 566,477 t 15,514 t Republic of Korea
2020s 628,161 t 686,849 t 58,688 t Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) or Republic of Korea?
Republic of Korea, at 769,665 t against 735,774 t in Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) as of 2024.
What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Republic of Korea?
33,891 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Republic of Korea?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) and Republic of Korea rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) ranks 10th and Republic of Korea ranks 9th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Republic of Korea: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/potassium-chloride-muriate-of-potash-mop-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/republic-of-korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/potassium-chloride-muriate-of-potash-mop-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand-excluding-intra-trade/republic-of-korea/">Australia and New Zealand (excluding intra-trade) vs Republic of Korea: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
222 places, 4,456 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf