Bulgaria vs Kuwait: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Bulgaria
- Kuwait
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 21,138 t against 20,545 t in Kuwait, a difference of 593 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 65th and Kuwait ranks 66th of 177 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,892 t | 2,273 t | 619.43 t | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 9,595 t | 3,544 t | 6,051 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 17,659 t | 12,698 t | 4,961 t | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Bulgaria or Kuwait?
- Bulgaria, at 21,138 t against 20,545 t in Kuwait as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Bulgaria and Kuwait?
- 593 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Kuwait?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Kuwait rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Bulgaria ranks 65th and Kuwait ranks 66th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf