Cameroon vs Croatia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Cameroon
- Croatia
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 47,269 t against 45,803 t in Croatia, a difference of 1,466 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Croatia ahead.
Cameroon ranks 51st and Croatia ranks 53rd of 178 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25,154 t | 131,050 t | 105,895 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 29,677 t | 98,594 t | 68,917 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 32,752 t | 48,148 t | 15,396 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Cameroon or Croatia?
- Cameroon, at 47,269 t against 45,803 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Cameroon and Croatia?
- 1,466 t, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Croatia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Croatia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Cameroon ranks 51st and Croatia ranks 53rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf