Congo vs Uganda: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Congo
- Uganda
How they compare
Congo currently reports 6,283 t against 5,373 t in Uganda, a difference of 910 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Uganda ahead.
Congo ranks 84th and Uganda ranks 86th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 98.97 t | 247.57 t | 148.6 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 992.66 t | 958.33 t | 34.33 t | Congo |
| 2020s | 3,953 t | 4,159 t | 205.4 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Congo or Uganda?
- Congo, at 6,283 t against 5,373 t in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Congo and Uganda?
- 910 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Congo ranks 84th and Uganda ranks 86th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf