Cuba vs Libya: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Cuba
- Libya
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1,044 t against 585.21 t in Libya, a difference of 458.79 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.8 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 117th and Libya ranks 119th of 190 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42,604 t | 1,441 t | 41,163 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 53,934 t | 504.88 t | 53,429 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 2,873 t | 344.92 t | 2,528 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Cuba or Libya?
- Cuba, at 1,044 t against 585.21 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Cuba and Libya?
- 458.79 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Libya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Libya rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Cuba ranks 117th and Libya ranks 119th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf