Cyprus vs Ethiopia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Cyprus
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 135.38 t against 131.57 t in Cyprus, a difference of 3.81 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 130th and Ethiopia ranks 129th of 178 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.17 t | 62.98 t | 61.8 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 78.77 t | 95.19 t | 16.43 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 32.47 t | 56.95 t | 24.49 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Cyprus or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 135.38 t against 131.57 t in Cyprus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Cyprus and Ethiopia?
- 3.81 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Ethiopia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Ethiopia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Cyprus ranks 130th and Ethiopia ranks 129th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf