Denmark vs Zimbabwe: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Denmark
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 41,799 t against 40,979 t in Denmark, a difference of 820 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 177 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86,407 t | 18,332 t | 68,075 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 46,074 t | 21,790 t | 24,284 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 64,510 t | 50,676 t | 13,833 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Denmark or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 41,799 t against 40,979 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Denmark and Zimbabwe?
- 820 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Zimbabwe rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Denmark ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf