Dominica vs Guinea: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Dominica
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 0.02 t against 0.01 t in Dominica, a difference of 0.01 t.
That makes Guinea's figure about 2.0 times Dominica's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 169th and Guinea ranks 167th of 178 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.02 t | 672.02 t | 672 t | Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.4 t | 1,352 t | 1,350 t | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.01 t | 0.07 t | 0.06 t | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Dominica or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 0.02 t against 0.01 t in Dominica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Dominica and Guinea?
- 0.01 t, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Guinea?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Dominica and Guinea rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Dominica ranks 169th and Guinea ranks 167th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf