Ecuador vs Italy: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 299,598 t against 240,872 t in Ecuador, a difference of 58,726 t.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Italy ranks 23rd of 178 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88,771 t | 351,175 t | 262,404 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 141,646 t | 311,739 t | 170,093 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 183,246 t | 299,444 t | 116,198 t | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Ecuador or Italy?
- Italy, at 299,598 t against 240,872 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Ecuador and Italy?
- 58,726 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Italy?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Italy rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Italy ranks 23rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf