Ecuador vs Türkiye: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 242,866 t against 240,872 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1,994 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Türkiye ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 178 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88,771 t | 106,055 t | 17,284 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 141,646 t | 151,725 t | 10,079 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 183,246 t | 245,353 t | 62,107 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Ecuador or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 242,866 t against 240,872 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Ecuador and Türkiye?
- 1,994 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Türkiye?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Türkiye rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf