Gabon vs Slovakia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Gabon
- Slovakia
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 3,652 t against 3,202 t in Slovakia, a difference of 450 t.
That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Slovakia's.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Gabon ranks 92nd and Slovakia ranks 94th of 178 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,455 t | 28,035 t | 25,580 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 2,748 t | 15,713 t | 12,965 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 2,519 t | 9,087 t | 6,567 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Gabon or Slovakia?
- Gabon, at 3,652 t against 3,202 t in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Gabon and Slovakia?
- 450 t, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Slovakia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Gabon and Slovakia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Gabon ranks 92nd and Slovakia ranks 94th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf