Guinea vs Guyana: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Guinea
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0.03 t against 0.02 t in Guinea, a difference of 0.01 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.5 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 167th and Guyana ranks 166th of 177 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 510.44 t | 0.1175 t | 510.33 t | Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,027 t | 593.74 t | 432.91 t | Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.1425 t | 0.015 t | 0.1275 t | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Guinea or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 0.03 t against 0.02 t in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Guinea and Guyana?
- 0.01 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Guyana?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Guyana rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Guinea ranks 167th and Guyana ranks 166th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf