Guyana vs Tonga: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Guyana
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 0.06 t against 0.03 t in Guyana, a difference of 0.03 t.
That makes Tonga's figure about 2.0 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.73 t | 41.29 t | 29.56 t | Tonga |
| 2010s | 532.02 t | 82.03 t | 449.99 t | Guyana |
| 2020s | 4.49 t | 0.545 t | 3.95 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Guyana or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 0.06 t against 0.03 t in Guyana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Guyana and Tonga?
- 0.03 t, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Tonga?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Guyana and Tonga rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Guyana ranks 166th and Tonga ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf