Hungary vs Latvia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Hungary
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 67,283 t against 61,041 t in Hungary, a difference of 6,242 t.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 45th of 178 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 129,116 t | 13,783 t | 115,334 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 108,736 t | 11,259 t | 97,477 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 81,654 t | 39,892 t | 41,762 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Hungary or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 67,283 t against 61,041 t in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Hungary and Latvia?
- 6,242 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Hungary ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 45th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf