Iceland vs Yemen: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Iceland
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 54.21 t against 23.43 t in Iceland, a difference of 30.78 t.
That makes Yemen's figure about 2.3 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 140th and Yemen ranks 137th of 178 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 835.81 t | 1,628 t | 792.38 t | Yemen |
| 2010s | 7.58 t | 157.01 t | 149.43 t | Yemen |
| 2020s | 2.46 t | 247.3 t | 244.84 t | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Iceland or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 54.21 t against 23.43 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Iceland and Yemen?
- 30.78 t, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Yemen?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Yemen rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Iceland ranks 140th and Yemen ranks 137th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf