Iraq vs Slovakia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Iraq
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 3,202 t against 2,890 t in Iraq, a difference of 312 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 96th and Slovakia ranks 94th of 178 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 265.9 t | 21,307 t | 21,041 t | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 4,853 t | 15,713 t | 10,860 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 2,232 t | 7,910 t | 5,678 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Iraq or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 3,202 t against 2,890 t in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Iraq and Slovakia?
- 312 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Slovakia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Slovakia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Iraq ranks 96th and Slovakia ranks 94th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf