Israel vs Libya: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Israel
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 585.21 t against 502.97 t in Israel, a difference of 82.24 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Libya ahead.
Israel ranks 113th and Libya ranks 111th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 291.33 t | 1,441 t | 1,150 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 1,159 t | 504.88 t | 654.59 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 407.39 t | 344.92 t | 62.47 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Israel or Libya?
- Libya, at 585.21 t against 502.97 t in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Israel and Libya?
- 82.24 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Libya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Libya rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Israel ranks 113th and Libya ranks 111th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf