Kenya vs Kuwait: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Kenya
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 20,545 t against 15,766 t in Kenya, a difference of 4,779 t.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.3 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 69th and Kuwait ranks 66th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Kuwait in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 520.49 t | 2,273 t | 1,752 t | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 3,390 t | 3,338 t | 51.3 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 19,886 t | 12,698 t | 7,188 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Kenya or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 20,545 t against 15,766 t in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Kenya and Kuwait?
- 4,779 t, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Kuwait?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Kuwait rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Kenya ranks 69th and Kuwait ranks 66th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf