Lesotho vs New Caledonia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Lesotho
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.01 t against 0.01 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 169th and New Caledonia ranks 169th of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.57 t | 1.33 t | 25.24 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 1.31 t | 2.2 t | 0.89 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Lesotho or New Caledonia?
- Lesotho, at 0.01 t against 0.01 t in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Lesotho and New Caledonia?
- 0 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and New Caledonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Lesotho and New Caledonia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Lesotho ranks 169th and New Caledonia ranks 169th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf