Luxembourg vs Niger: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Luxembourg
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 408.45 t against 407.61 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.84 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 117th and Niger ranks 116th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 901.51 t | 55.62 t | 845.89 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 1,164 t | 1,125 t | 39.07 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 501.29 t | 1,223 t | 722.11 t | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Luxembourg or Niger?
- Niger, at 408.45 t against 407.61 t in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Luxembourg and Niger?
- 0.84 t, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Niger?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Niger rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Luxembourg ranks 117th and Niger ranks 116th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf