Malta vs Mauritania: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Malta
- Mauritania
How they compare
Malta currently reports 5.85 t against 2.08 t in Mauritania, a difference of 3.77 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 2.8 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritania ahead.
Malta ranks 147th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 178 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 28.55 t | 303 t | 274.44 t | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 6.15 t | 19.34 t | 13.19 t | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Malta or Mauritania?
- Malta, at 5.85 t against 2.08 t in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Malta and Mauritania?
- 3.77 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Mauritania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Malta and Mauritania rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Malta ranks 147th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf