Nepal vs Zambia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Nepal
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 10,764 t against 7,655 t in Nepal, a difference of 3,109 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.4 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.
Nepal ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 76th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 t | 10,247 t | 10,245 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 531.35 t | 10,283 t | 9,752 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 11,091 t | 8,190 t | 2,901 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Nepal or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 10,764 t against 7,655 t in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Nepal and Zambia?
- 3,109 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zambia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Nepal and Zambia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Nepal ranks 79th and Zambia ranks 76th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf