Peru vs Serbia: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity over time
- Peru
- Serbia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 133,334 t against 113,445 t in Serbia, a difference of 19,889 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Peru ranks 33rd and Serbia ranks 36th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62,100 t | 77,438 t | 15,337 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 100,048 t | 69,084 t | 30,964 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 107,736 t | 93,633 t | 14,103 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity, Peru or Serbia?
- Peru, at 133,334 t against 113,445 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity between Peru and Serbia?
- 19,889 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import quantity?
- Peru ranks 33rd and Serbia ranks 36th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf