Burundi vs Niue: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value over time
- Burundi
- Niue
How they compare
Niue currently reports 0.29 1000 USD against 0.23 1000 USD in Burundi, a difference of 0.06 1000 USD.
That makes Niue's figure about 1.3 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 167th and Niue ranks 165th of 178 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Niue | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 218.88 1000 USD | 0.1425 1000 USD | 218.74 1000 USD | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0.455 1000 USD | 0.275 1000 USD | 0.18 1000 USD | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value, Burundi or Niue?
- Niue, at 0.29 1000 USD against 0.23 1000 USD in Burundi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value between Burundi and Niue?
- 0.06 1000 USD, with Niue ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Niue?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Niue rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value?
- Burundi ranks 167th and Niue ranks 165th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf