Burundi vs Samoa: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value over time
- Burundi
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.45 1000 USD against 0.23 1000 USD in Burundi, a difference of 0.22 1000 USD.
That makes Samoa's figure about 2.0 times Burundi's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 166th and Samoa ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 224.45 1000 USD | 0.17 1000 USD | 224.28 1000 USD | Burundi |
| 2010s | 200.58 1000 USD | 0.8567 1000 USD | 199.72 1000 USD | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value, Burundi or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 0.45 1000 USD against 0.23 1000 USD in Burundi as of 2017.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value between Burundi and Samoa?
- 0.22 1000 USD, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Samoa?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Burundi and Samoa rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value?
- Burundi ranks 166th and Samoa ranks 163rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf