Chad vs Cuba: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value over time
- Chad
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 563.69 1000 USD against 545.36 1000 USD in Chad, a difference of 18.33 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Chad ranks 106th and Cuba ranks 105th of 177 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 408.14 1000 USD | 11,903 1000 USD | 11,495 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2010s | 879.59 1000 USD | 18,474 1000 USD | 17,594 1000 USD | Cuba |
| 2020s | 937.8 1000 USD | 1,752 1000 USD | 813.74 1000 USD | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value, Chad or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 563.69 1000 USD against 545.36 1000 USD in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value between Chad and Cuba?
- 18.33 1000 USD, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Cuba?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Cuba rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value?
- Chad ranks 106th and Cuba ranks 105th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf