Chile vs Ghana: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value over time
- Chile
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 10,947 1000 USD against 10,561 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 386 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 63rd and Ghana ranks 62nd of 178 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,211 1000 USD | 1,640 1000 USD | 1,572 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 20,119 1000 USD | 4,977 1000 USD | 15,142 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2020s | 21,204 1000 USD | 6,378 1000 USD | 14,826 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value, Chile or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 10,947 1000 USD against 10,561 1000 USD in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value between Chile and Ghana?
- 386 1000 USD, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ghana?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Ghana rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value?
- Chile ranks 63rd and Ghana ranks 62nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf