Ecuador vs Mexico: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value over time
- Ecuador
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 62,657 1000 USD against 62,301 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 356 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.
Ecuador ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 27th of 178 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29,726 1000 USD | 64,834 1000 USD | 35,108 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2010s | 53,599 1000 USD | 76,720 1000 USD | 23,121 1000 USD | Mexico |
| 2020s | 60,946 1000 USD | 81,145 1000 USD | 20,199 1000 USD | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value, Ecuador or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 62,657 1000 USD against 62,301 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value between Ecuador and Mexico?
- 356 1000 USD, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value?
- Ecuador ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 27th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf