Latvia vs Mali: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value over time
- Latvia
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 22,991 1000 USD against 22,886 1000 USD in Latvia, a difference of 105 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 52nd and Mali ranks 51st of 178 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,686 1000 USD | 5,771 1000 USD | 3,085 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2010s | 4,492 1000 USD | 27,230 1000 USD | 22,738 1000 USD | Mali |
| 2020s | 14,299 1000 USD | 14,482 1000 USD | 182.66 1000 USD | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value, Latvia or Mali?
- Mali, at 22,991 1000 USD against 22,886 1000 USD in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value between Latvia and Mali?
- 105 1000 USD, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — import value?
- Latvia ranks 52nd and Mali ranks 51st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf