Belarus vs Jordan: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Production
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Production over time
- Belarus
- Jordan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 12.23 million t against 2.09 million t in Jordan, a difference of 10.14 million t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 5.9 times Jordan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 3rd and Jordan ranks 4th of 48 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.96 million t | 1.77 million t | 5.19 million t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 9.01 million t | 2.01 million t | 7.01 million t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — production, Belarus or Jordan?
- Belarus, at 12.23 million t against 2.09 million t in Jordan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — production between Belarus and Jordan?
- 10.14 million t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — production?
- Belarus ranks 3rd and Jordan ranks 4th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf