Malawi vs Portugal: Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Production
Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Production over time
- Malawi
- Portugal
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 8,817 t against 919.8 t in Portugal, a difference of 7,897 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 9.6 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Portugal ahead.
Malawi ranks 12th and Portugal ranks 13th of 48 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 1,531 t | 1,531 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 8,817 t | 919.8 t | 7,897 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — production, Malawi or Portugal?
- Malawi, at 8,817 t against 919.8 t in Portugal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — production between Malawi and Portugal?
- 7,897 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Portugal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Portugal rank globally for potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (mop) — production?
- Malawi ranks 12th and Portugal ranks 13th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium chloride (muriate of potash) (MOP) — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf