Croatia vs Zambia: Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use

Croatia
0 t
in 2024
Zambia
1 t
in 2011
Croatia rank
68th
Zambia rank
65th

Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use over time

  • Croatia
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k200320132024

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Croatia, a difference of 1 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 68th and Zambia ranks 65th of 81 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 250 t 24,087 t 23,837 t Zambia
2010s 202.5 t 13.5 t 189 t Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potassium nitrate — agricultural use, Croatia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1 t against 0 t in Croatia as of 2011.
What is the difference in potassium nitrate — agricultural use between Croatia and Zambia?
1 t, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for potassium nitrate — agricultural use?
Croatia ranks 68th and Zambia ranks 65th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 818 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf