Cuba vs Zambia: Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use

Cuba
6 t
in 2011
Zambia
1 t
in 2011
Cuba rank
62nd
Zambia rank
65th

Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use over time

  • Cuba
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k200220062011

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 6 t against 1 t in Zambia, a difference of 5 t.

That makes Cuba's figure about 6.0 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zambia ahead.

Cuba ranks 62nd and Zambia ranks 65th of 81 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 116.67 t 24,087 t 23,970 t Zambia
2010s 7 t 13.5 t 6.5 t Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher potassium nitrate — agricultural use, Cuba or Zambia?
Cuba, at 6 t against 1 t in Zambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in potassium nitrate — agricultural use between Cuba and Zambia?
5 t, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zambia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
How do Cuba and Zambia rank globally for potassium nitrate — agricultural use?
Cuba ranks 62nd and Zambia ranks 65th of 81 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Potassium nitrate — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 818 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf