New Caledonia vs North Macedonia: Potassium nitrate β Agricultural Use
Potassium nitrate β Agricultural Use over time
- New Caledonia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 28 t against 26 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 2 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Caledonia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 51st and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 77 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.5 t | 51.62 t | 42.88 t | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 28 t | 27.5 t | 0.5 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate β agricultural use, New Caledonia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 28 t against 26 t in New Caledonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate β agricultural use between New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
- 2 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and North Macedonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do New Caledonia and North Macedonia rank globally for potassium nitrate β agricultural use?
- New Caledonia ranks 51st and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf