New Caledonia vs Slovak Republic: Potassium nitrate β Agricultural Use
Potassium nitrate β Agricultural Use over time
- New Caledonia
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 35 t against 26 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 9 t.
That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Slovak Republic has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 51st and Slovak Republic ranks 48th of 77 countries.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.2 t | 353.2 t | 259 t | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 27.33 t | 203.33 t | 176 t | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate β agricultural use, New Caledonia or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 35 t against 26 t in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate β agricultural use between New Caledonia and Slovak Republic?
- 9 t, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Slovak Republic?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do New Caledonia and Slovak Republic rank globally for potassium nitrate β agricultural use?
- New Caledonia ranks 51st and Slovak Republic ranks 48th of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf