Argentina vs South Africa: Potassium nitrate — Import quantity
Potassium nitrate — Import quantity over time
- Argentina
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 32,609 t against 15,725 t in Argentina, a difference of 16,884 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 2.1 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was South Africa ahead.
Argentina ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 16th of 180 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,894 t | 29,006 t | 10,112 t | South Africa |
| 2010s | 16,503 t | 31,141 t | 14,638 t | South Africa |
| 2020s | 15,185 t | 30,107 t | 14,922 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import quantity, Argentina or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 32,609 t against 15,725 t in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import quantity between Argentina and South Africa?
- 16,884 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and South Africa rank globally for potassium nitrate — import quantity?
- Argentina ranks 15th and South Africa ranks 16th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf