Latvia vs Syrian Arab Republic: Potassium nitrate — Import quantity
Potassium nitrate — Import quantity over time
- Latvia
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 108 t against 105.86 t in Latvia, a difference of 2.14 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 97th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.66 t | 1.38 t | 82.27 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 133.97 t | 340.15 t | 206.18 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | 105.86 t | 108 t | 2.14 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import quantity, Latvia or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 108 t against 105.86 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import quantity between Latvia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 2.14 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for potassium nitrate — import quantity?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 97th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf