Chile vs El Salvador: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Chile
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 55.1 1000 USD against 50.86 1000 USD in Chile, a difference of 4.24 1000 USD.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was El Salvador ahead.
Chile ranks 111th and El Salvador ranks 108th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 424.06 1000 USD | 136.21 1000 USD | 287.85 1000 USD | Chile |
| 2010s | 121.9 1000 USD | 259.19 1000 USD | 137.3 1000 USD | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 587.1 1000 USD | 114.62 1000 USD | 472.48 1000 USD | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Chile or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 55.1 1000 USD against 50.86 1000 USD in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Chile and El Salvador?
- 4.24 1000 USD, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and El Salvador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Chile and El Salvador rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Chile ranks 111th and El Salvador ranks 108th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf