Eswatini vs Guinea: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 8.8 1000 USD against 7.59 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 1.21 1000 USD.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 136th and Guinea ranks 135th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.84 1000 USD | 5.9 1000 USD | 4.06 1000 USD | Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.52 1000 USD | 1.91 1000 USD | 0.6183 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 7.59 1000 USD | 8.8 1000 USD | 1.21 1000 USD | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Eswatini or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 8.8 1000 USD against 7.59 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Eswatini and Guinea?
- 1.21 1000 USD, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Eswatini ranks 136th and Guinea ranks 135th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf