Kyrgyzstan vs Madagascar: Potassium nitrate — Import value
Potassium nitrate — Import value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 30.36 1000 USD against 29.63 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.73 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Madagascar ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 121st and Madagascar ranks 119th of 180 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.37 1000 USD | 15.46 1000 USD | 4.09 1000 USD | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 21.87 1000 USD | 18.22 1000 USD | 3.65 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 36.44 1000 USD | 38.99 1000 USD | 2.55 1000 USD | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher potassium nitrate — import value, Kyrgyzstan or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 30.36 1000 USD against 29.63 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in potassium nitrate — import value between Kyrgyzstan and Madagascar?
- 0.73 1000 USD, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Madagascar?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Madagascar rank globally for potassium nitrate — import value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 121st and Madagascar ranks 119th of 180 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Potassium nitrate — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf